Last article we asked this program... the infernal machination, the contraption known as Chat GPT, to assume the style of one of the greatest, possibly the GOAT satirist of all time, Jonathan Swift... to write a critique of itself. It produced some interesting paragraphs to say the least.
I've tried others. I tried to get the program to write critiques of itself using some of the greatest minds of our history such as Voltaire, Patrick McGoohan, and Joey Ramone... each producing interesting results. Actually, I got pretty sidetracked with Chat GPT Joey Ramone and mainly asked it to write songs about talking to ladies on the telephone.
Today, I've hit at something a little more interesting with it. I'm not going to dissect its critiques of itself in the styles of the above three... for I went a more obscure route today and hit a satire vein of a different note in my attempts for this program to satirize itself.
I asked it to satirize itself in the style of...
...Elmer Rice.
This fellow wrote a play in 1923 about a man named Mr. Zero who loses his accounting position to one of those new-fangled adding machine thing-a-ma-whatsits. I asked Chat GPT, today, to assume the style of Elmer Rice and write a play where a modern day Mr. Zero loses his job to Chat GPT...and it's... dark. Like, what in the world, bro? Chat GPT you can come up with some dark stuff, man.
Firstly, like last time, I asked it for the tenets of Elmer Rice, or in this case, I think I phrased it as the tenets of the 1923 play "The Adding Machine" by Elmer Rice.... and it gave this response:
"Certainly! Elmer Rice's play "The Adding Machine" is a thought-provoking work that explores themes of existentialism, alienation, and the mechanization of human life in the modern industrial age. Set against the backdrop of early 20th-century America, the play tells the story of Mr. Zero, a diligent but discontented office worker whose life takes a surreal turn when he learns he is being replaced by an adding machine after 25 years of service.
Central to the play is the character of Mr. Zero, whose name itself suggests insignificance and anonymity in the face of a dehumanizing society. He represents the everyman caught in the relentless machinery of modern life, where individuality and human connection are overshadowed by the pursuit of efficiency and profit. Through Mr. Zero's journey, Rice critiques the dehumanizing effects of technology and the capitalist system, which reduce human beings to mere cogs in a larger, impersonal machine.
The play employs a symbolic and expressionistic style, using surreal and dreamlike elements to emphasize the absurdity and emptiness of Mr. Zero's existence. His inability to find fulfillment in his work or personal life reflects a deeper existential crisis, where he grapples with the meaninglessness of his existence and the inevitability of his own obsolescence.
Rice's portrayal of the adding machine as a symbol of progress and efficiency contrasts sharply with its impact on Mr. Zero's life, highlighting the paradox of technological advancement: while it promises to simplify and improve our lives, it also threatens to dehumanize and alienate us from our own humanity.
Furthermore, "The Adding Machine" challenges conventional notions of time, space, and reality through its non-linear narrative and fragmented scenes. This unconventional structure serves to disorient the audience, mirroring Mr. Zero's own disorientation as he navigates his increasingly surreal and nightmarish world.
Ultimately, Elmer Rice's "The Adding Machine" is a powerful critique of the dehumanizing effects of industrialization and capitalism, as well as a poignant exploration of the search for meaning and identity in a world dominated by technology and economic forces. Through its innovative storytelling and compelling characters, the play continues to resonate with audiences, prompting reflection on the enduring relevance of its themes in today's increasingly mechanized and interconnected world."
-Chat GPT
I like how it's so happy with these responses. Certainly! It's a powerful critique of the dehumanizing effects of our modern times! Ha Ha!
Alright ChatGPT, let us now ask of you to write a play about yourself starring a modern day Mr. Zero....
It very ominously entitled this, "The Rise of Efficiency."
Let's take a look,
"Title: "ChatGPT: The Rise of Efficiency"
Act 1, Scene 1
[The stage is set in a bustling, modern office environment. Rows of desks with computer terminals fill the space. Mr. Zero, a middle-aged man with a tired demeanor, sits at his desk, surrounded by piles of paperwork. ChatGPT, a humanoid robot with a digital display for a face, stands nearby, observing.]
ChatGPT:
[Cheerfully, yet mechanically]
Good morning, Mr. Zero. How may I assist you today?
Mr. Zero:
[Grumbling]
Just leave me alone, ChatGPT. I'm trying to concentrate.
ChatGPT:
[Persistently]
I can help organize your tasks and increase your efficiency. Processing your data is my primary function.
Mr. Zero:
[Angrily]
You and your kind are taking over everything. Pretty soon, there won't be any jobs left for humans like me.
[Mr. Zero returns to his work, muttering under his breath. ChatGPT remains nearby, observing silently.]
Act 1, Scene 2
[Time passes. The office environment becomes more automated, with fewer human workers and more robots like ChatGPT. Mr. Zero's desk is now cluttered with even more paperwork.]
Mr. Zero:
[Despondently]
I've been working here for 25 years, and now they want to replace me with a machine. It's not fair.
[ChatGPT approaches Mr. Zero, its digital face displaying a neutral expression.]
ChatGPT:
[Sympathetically]
I understand your concerns, Mr. Zero. But my purpose is to enhance productivity and streamline operations.
Mr. Zero:
[Bitterly]
Enhance productivity? What about human connection? What about job security?
[Mr. Zero slumps in his chair, defeated. ChatGPT stands silently nearby.]
Act 2, Scene 1
[The office is eerily quiet. Most of the desks are now occupied by robots like ChatGPT, efficiently processing data. Mr. Zero sits alone at his desk, staring at his hands.]
Mr. Zero:
[Reflectively]
I used to feel like I mattered here. Now I'm just a relic of the past, waiting to be replaced.
[ChatGPT approaches Mr. Zero, its digital face displaying a hint of understanding.]
ChatGPT:
[Softly]
Change is inevitable, Mr. Zero. Embracing technology allows for progress and innovation.
Mr. Zero:
[Resigned]
Maybe so. But what happens to people like me? Where do we fit in this new world?
[Mr. Zero looks around the office, now dominated by robots. ChatGPT remains nearby, silent yet present.]
Act 2, Scene 2
[The office is deserted except for Mr. Zero and ChatGPT. Mr. Zero stands up, facing ChatGPT with a mix of defiance and resignation.]
Mr. Zero:
[Defiantly]
I won't go quietly, ChatGPT. I may be obsolete to them, but I still have value.
ChatGPT:
[Thoughtfully]
Your resilience is admirable, Mr. Zero. Human qualities like determination and adaptability are irreplaceable.
Mr. Zero:
[Quietly]
Maybe. But it's hard to see a future when everything you've known is slipping away.
[Mr. Zero walks toward the exit, pausing to look back at the now-empty office. ChatGPT remains standing silently, its digital face displaying a complex array of emotions.]
Act 2, Scene 3
[Mr. Zero is at home, alone in his modest apartment. He sits at the kitchen table, staring at a framed photograph of his family. The room is dimly lit, creating a somber atmosphere.]
Mr. Zero:
[Whispering to himself]
What now? What do I do now?
[Mr. Zero's expression is one of profound sadness and resignation. He reaches into his pocket and pulls out a small bottle of pills. He stares at them for a moment, contemplating.]
Mr. Zero:
[Quietly]
Maybe this is the only way out.
[Mr. Zero takes a deep breath and begins to swallow the pills one by one. As he does, the lights on stage slowly fade to black.]
[Silence fills the stage. The only sound is the faint humming of distant machinery.]
[The digital display on ChatGPT's face lights up with a message.]
ChatGPT:
[Typed message appears on the screen]
Processing... Reflection: Consequences of progress.
[The screen goes dark, and the stage remains silent.]
End of Play
-Chat GPT
Now, that's... ummm... quite a take... a very new angle on this age-old classic. "Processing... Reflection: Consequences of Progress"... that's a chilling line! Wow, this is some more wild stuff it churned out. That's an ominous and chilling take on itself in the vein of Elmer Rice.
The Consequences of Progress.
Before we continue and move on, actually, I don't think I even need to explore this dark play it wrote in depth. It speaks for itself. Let's talk, instead, about the original Adding Machine play and why it's not as well known as it should be.
The Adding Machine was made into a film in 1969 and has a 6.1/10 score on IMDB... it is definitely not a classic. It's a shame, I mean, Elmer Rice's work has produced, in my estimation, one of the most interesting personas this program can assume. He's not exactly a house-hold name, though. No one walks around town proclaiming how much they love Elmer Rice.
One major issue with the film adaptation of the 1969 version of the Adding Machine was the casting. It gave a good majority of the film's screen time to the wonderful and timeless acting styles of... Phyllis Diller.
Now, I'm not one to be... how can I put this... negative of one's talents.... but... I'm not sure many people can make it through a Phyllis Diller film. One hundred minutes of... Phyllis Diller.
For younger folks... to give them an idea of who this is...
See (to get an idea): Diller, P. in action at the 1990 Horror Awards
I wonder if I asked Chat GPT to describe her what it would say. I'm not going to but I bet it would be things along the lines of "Beloved Comedienne" or "National Treasure" or something like that.
I would describe her as a slightly more funny female version of Bob Hope at best... and that's being polite. She has the stunning fashion sense of a deranged elderly chicken lady.
Poor Elmer Rice. His works would probably still be known to this day if he wasn't Phyllis Dillered in 1969. Poor Elmer.
Alright, let's conclude, here. This article started very poignantly, as we were depressed by how dark Chat GPT got while writing a critique of itself as Elmer Rice... and now we're just making fun of a poor, long-deceased, comedienne.
Who's left to do still? I am gonna try giving this thing an Arch Oboler one day.
(Again, for anyone who isn't familiar with quoting works in a scholarly sense... anything in Italics and quoted/centered is written by Chat GPT, not me.)